Google is said to be testing these changes out on Mac laptops specifically, and based on early tests, they have found that the improvements they made have had a dramatic impact on. One of the themes of my previous Apple Silicon M1 article - Apple Silicon M1: Black. - was the stupendous battery life offered by the new M1-based MacBooks. While unveiling the M1 chip, Apple touted the new M1-based MacBook Air and MacBook Pro's energy efficiency with up to 18 hours and 20 hours of movie playback, 6 and 10 hours more than previous models.Mac, and Linux, Google Chrome is the most widely used desktop browser in the. These are made possible because of Apple's focus on low-power design and decoding video using specialized hardware engines rather than relying on the general-purpose CPU. Decoding video using a chip built for the sole purpose of decoding video can dramatically affect power consumption, as you will see later in this blog. Highlighted components are dedicated to low-power video playback This blog is Part 1 of a multi-part series of investigations into the actual power these M1 chips consume in some of the most common scenarios. This Part 1 focuses on one of the most critical Pandemic activities - streaming a video from YouTube or Netflix. The lower the power consumption, the longer your battery will last (if you're not connected to the charger).
I’ve just bought (2 weeks ago) a brand new MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar, and I immediately sensed that battery drains significantly quickly, around 3-4 hours usage, which kind of reminds me my old MacBook Pro 2013 battery time which I used till two weeks ago for exactly the same usage.However, when Chrome stepped up to the plate, it was a different story altogether. Before you download, you can check if Chrome supports your operating system and you have all the other system requirements.A bit long one but. When you are done with all the work, shut down your MacBook instead of putting it on sleep.Google Chrome is a fast, free web browser. In my personal testing, I did see battery improvements while using the Microsoft Edge browser compared to Google Chrome. Sony playstation 2 emulator for macYes , I know browsers , specially chrome and specially google services are energy consuming. OS: Mojave 10.14.3Chrome, Photoshop CC2019, Sketch, Dropbox, Whatsapp. Still so far no results, but a firm conclusion that a brand new MacBook Pro 2018 shouldn’t drain after 3-4 hours.So here is a breakdown of problem so far:MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar, 2018 Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5 8 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 1536 MB). Thats Popular Science, 145 years strong.I did a huge research about this issue including searching the web , asking colleagues who has similar Macbooks from the past year, and contacting twice Apple Support over the phone. Skunks to space robots, primates to climates. Also preform several battery tests with the Apple support over the phone and battery looks ok Talking however with colleges who has up to 1 year old MacBook Pro with more or less the same usage , indicates 6-7 hours battery time.20 (15 days of usage). But - I noticed that on weekends when I usually use only web browsing with no graphics, the battery performance is quite the same as weekdays. So I switched to Safari for the last week - a slight improve. ![]() Tested working with chrome only in Safe Mode. Re-installed Mojave from recovery mode (not erasing the whole files and apps) Talking with Apple support on the second time, I preform the following: All the rest “heavy” apps uses around 15-25None of these had a significant improvement , switching to Safari however improved it slightly. Checking the Activity Monitor every once in a while, Chrome is on top using Avg Energy Impact of 20-60. All that matters to Google is that they are continually harvesting your personal information so that they can sell it, a resource-intensive process that uses copious amounts of energy. Thx.Read See how apps affect Mac performance, battery runtime, temperature, and fan activityChecking the Activity Monitor every once in a while, Chrome is on top using Avg Energy Impact of 20-60.Google does not care if it consumes all your Mac's resources. I’d appreciate if someone has another idea before I send it to a lab. Paying $2400 for a new Mac pretty much reflects how important this machine for me , this extreme battery drain certainly doesn’t meet the expectations. I’m honestly on the verge of despair. After 1:28 hr of constant youtube, battery reached to 6%. ![]() Google Chrome Battery Life Improvment Full Cash RefundGoogle Chrome is not just a browser. If you are required to use Google products I suggest returning your Mac for a full cash refund and buying a Chromebook instead.I surmise I was not clear. If I used Google I probably would have had to replace this Mac years ago.It's your Mac though, and your money. Estimated to be about $10 billion this year alone, just to retain their position as Safari's default search engine. After all Apple gets a lot of money from Google. Your observation ( half of mac's battery cycle) is approximately correct.It only gets worse as Google pushes updates to your Mac in the background, making it difficult to correlate the sudden onset of poor performance or battery consumption to anything obvious.You could almost make a case for the fact Apple and Google collude to ensure you're always buying new Macs. Chrome's energy inefficiency is notorious regardless of the platform—Macs, Windows, Linux—and it's only grown worse over time. If you want your Mac's battery to last, don't install Google.It seems like if the worlds most popular browser will be the cause for draining half of mac's battery cycle, we should have heard about it a lot more.I don't know how it's possible to not hear about it. Unlike Chrome they are just browsers and were not developed for the sole purpose of harvesting, uploading, storing, and selling your personal information.Activity Monitor's Energy tab tells you all there is to know: a sustained "Avg Energy Impact of 20-60" is enormous. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorGeorge ArchivesCategories |